The Single Parent Homeschool

Archive for the ‘Unschooling’ Category

How We Organize Our Homeschooling Week – Part 1

author Posted by: Andrea on date Jan 10th, 2010 | filed Filed under: Charlotte Mason, Family Life, General Homeschooling, Unschooling, Weekly Rundowns, Workboxes

I was chatting on a workboxes homeschooling group, having one of those conversations where a mom asks if we all think she may be overloading her exasperated kids with “too much work” (the answer is invariably “yes” in these conversations, in case you’re curious). A lot of times, I find those conversations very exhausting, because they’re about the mom wanting strategies to be able to force her kid to do a lot more boring, tedious stuff, and then doing a lot of flailing because no one gives her any and instead tells her to relax and consider chucking, like, everything. Fortunately, in this case, it wasn’t like that, but had been initiated by a very well-meaning and thoughtful mom whose 7yo was getting frustrated despite the mom’s very best efforts, and she was looking to make the day more enjoyable for the family, a good goal to have imho ;) . During the conversation, she said their school day was lasting over 6 hours, and I said:

Just so you can see a different perspective: That’s over an hour longer than my son’s average workbox day – and he’s in the SIXTH GRADE, and he studies 2 foreign languages, practices 2 musical instruments, reads poetry, Shakespeare, Hymns, logic, Bible devotional, art history, music theory, medieval history, united states geography, literature and astronomy.

Another mom then asked me some questions about how it’s possible to organize my son’s time with the boxes (we don’t call them workboxes, just boxes) in such a way that it takes “so little time.” I think four hours is a lot of time! I thought I would repost my detailed response here. Italics were her questions, the rest is my response. It’s been a good talk, with the other mom asking a lot of good questions that made me think a lot and helped me clarify my own values some more, so hopefully this is helpful to someone. This is an ongoing dialogue, so there will be follow-ups with people’s questions in future posts, but feel free to ask your own! (Some of you longtime readers may notice we’ve changed a lot since starting this school year and are no longer using Ambleside Online’s recommendations. My son is still really interested in the Middle Ages, though, so he asked me to buy a few of the WinterPromise resources to learn more about the Middle Ages. More on this change at a later date!) A few of my answers have been proofread and/or expanded upon from the conversation where it was necessary for greater clarity.

My 6th grader does three subjects at a co-op (one is no homework), plus French, flute, history, and science at home, and it’s really hard for me to schedule all her subjects. Would you mind sharing a sample weekly schedule?

I don’t mind at all :)

The last few months, we have settled into a comfortable, flexible routine, where we get a much earlier start in the day than we used to. But we are both early morning lallygaggers and I work nights, so we get started later than most families. Typically my son starts his boxes between 10AM and 11AM, we break half an hour for lunch somewhere in there, and we’re done with the boxes by 2:30 or 3:30, depending on what we are doing. We then go out and do errands, or go to the park for a playdate, or other outings or sometimes we just chill out and goof off on the Internet, watch TV, play video games, build robots, or whatever else he’ll feel like doing. I try to schedule all doctor’s appointments for this time, too.

I will say that we don’t do any co-ops (my kid hates them) and I try to keep our field trip type outings for the weekend. We don’t do more than 2 field trips with our local homeschooling groups per month and it’s ONLY if my son seems excited about it, for example, the trip to see a Norman Rockwell exhibit next month. We have a lot of cool weekend and night time outings, but I’m a single mom and have to work, and there are only so many hours in the day! He has a park date weekly and a youth group twice a week at night, and sometimes a playdate with a friend, and that’s about it during the weekdays.

These are things which are not in the boxes, that he either does of his own free will and doesn’t want me to organize for him, or we do together as a family every day:

  • Computer programming/Internet surfing/ video game design
  • TV. We both like TV a lot and I won’t apologize for that. I’ve written several posts about why I love it and think it’s awesome. I don’t restrict TV in any way, but I do watch things with Shorty and talk about things we watch. Shorty is currently really into marathons of Everybody Hates Chris reruns :)
  • Afternoon walk, weather permitting, approx a mile and a half a day, for exercise and fresh air and chatting and sometimes Shorty likes to take our digital camera and take pictures of our walks and post them on his Facebook (he’s got a great eye for photography!!);
  • Instrument practice (guitar and piano) 10-15 min each, though he sometimes will spend hours in the afternoon practicing on his own;
  • Morning Bible devotionals and daily Bible reading, which Shorty has requested we do before anything else;
  • Bedtime literature. He says he’s too old to call it a bedtime story. *g* Sometimes he reads it out loud, sometimes I do, sometimes we switch off. Currently reading The King’s Fifth by Scott O’Dell, in concurrence with our study of the middle ages. It’s pretty awesome!!

These are the boxes we do daily:

  • Latin, Shorty’s pet subject #1 – Getting Started With Latin has turned out to be a big hit;
  • Math – typically two worksheets;
  • Wordly Wise vocabulary, Book 5 – pet subject #2;
  • Some kind of history reading. We have many books on the Middle Ages,  so sometimes we have more than one history reading – reading from the “spine” or main book (currently The Kingfisher’s Atlas of the Medieval World) and then a second book about the subject, usually very brief on each count. We’re talking no more than 2-3 pages, unless he wants to keep reading.
  • Geography/ map drawing, pet subject #3.
  • Poetry – we just read 1 poem a day from a Walter de la Mare poem book. We don’t discuss it too much or analyze it. We just read it for fun.

These are the boxes we do 2-3 times per week, as our schedule and his mood permits:

  • Spanish – We are native speakers, and live in Little Havana, so our focus is vocabulary expansion so that Shorty can communicate with locals more easily;
  • Astronomy: short reading, plus occasional notebooking/games – that would be a 2nd box;
  • Some kind of history-related project, lapbook or activity – currently we are alternating between a project from The Days of Knights and Dames and lapbooking about knights and castles;
  • Christian studies – we did a wonderful Advent study during Christmas that Shorty absolutely fell in love with, and he’s been reading A Little Pilgrim’s Progress;
  • Tangrams, which my kid loves, but not too often or he gets tired of them!

These are the subjects we do once per week:

  • Nature walks with nature studies,
  • Guitar lesson;
  • Piano lesson;
  • Logic – having great fun with The Fallacy Detective;
  • Hymn study with the book and CD, Then Sings My Soul;
  • Shakespeare – usually a couple of pages from a “Tales from Shakespeare” book;
  • Biography. Currently Diane Stanley’s Joan of Arc. Shorty really loves and gets into biographies and we are discussing organizing a study of inventors and industrial-revolution people (his other favorite historical era) when he finishes his current stuff;
  • Grammar – one weekly exercise from Simply Grammar by Karen Andreola for my little budding wordsmith;
  • Reading out loud from the McGuffey 3rd Eclectic Reader – he has great dramatic flair ;)

These are the things we only do every other week:

  • Juggling, a popular medieval pastime which he’s always wanted to learn anyway;
  • Art History OR Composer studies – We alternate between the two. One week we do one, the other week, we do the other. Shorty really gets excited about these, though, so I’m looking to see about doing this more often. Currenttly we are listening to a lot of Edvard Grieg and Sibelius, and leafing through my huge Norman Rockwell book, whose realism in illustration Shorty admires and envies. Fortunately, there is a traveling exhibit of his work right in town!

I’d love to see how you approach scheduling so many topics.

I have my little weekly workbox grid that I made. Because I like to plan for the whole year vs. little-by-little planning, even if I inevitably end up changing a million things as we go along, I printed out 36 of those, one for each week of the “school year,” which is all I have to keep track of for record-keeping purposes, though we do cool stuff almost every day all year long. I put subject dividers between each 12 - twelve weeks in a term, which our private umbrella school requires us to track. 180 days.

I am not married to this schedule in any way.  It is a list of possibilities for the day and nothing more.

I then take each resource and divide it up. If it’s a book, I divide its pages by 180, if it’s something we want to take all year to do. For example, the Latin curriculum he wanted has only 120 lessons. So we figured out that he needs to do about 3-4 lessons per week to finish it by the end of the year. So I go through the 36 weeks and put “Latin lesson #whatever” 3 or 4 times per week all year, until I get to 120. If it’s a shorter book, for example, we are reading the book Medieval Medicine and the Plague which has only 12 chapters, each about 2 pages long, I put it once per week for one term. Or I could put it once every 3 weeks all year, or whatever else had suited us.

NOTE: You do NOT have to plan things out for a whole year. You can divide the resource this way above, or you can plan one or two weeks ahead and not pre-determine how much you’re going to do. Then you’d just write “Legos” or “art/craft” or “Read such and such book.”

I do not feel the need to tell my son what to do all day long. My son has explicitly asked for help organizing his time and attention between his many interests, so I divide it up for him, but of course, if he wants to work ahead or postpone something one day, we do.

Sometimes I have a set amount to cover in a set amount of time. For The King’s Fifth, the novel we are reading right now, which has 31 chapters, I did not want to take months to read it, because we both lose interest and start to find it tedious when that happens, so I decided we’d read one chapter per day, which was 6 weeks if we read one chapter on a weekend. So I put in the “notes” section of my planner for week 1: “The King’s Fifth, Ch 1-5″. And then I put a checkmark as we read them, so I can at least tell where we are if I lose the bookmark. LOL!

FIRST, I do this with what he wants do every day. I fill in all the workboxes all year for those – labor intensive up-front, but saves me tons of time over the year.

THEN, I do this with the things he only wants do a few times a week.

FINALLY I plug in the ones he only does once a week or every other week. I just stick them wherever there’s an empty box!

I try to leave at least one empty box per day for spontaneous projects or for things he didn’t get to the day before or whatever. But it’s not necessary because the stuff we’re doing IS fun for him. If it’s not something he’s enjoying, I chuck it and we try something else or drop it. We have very few “schooly” things in there. I am constantly introducing new and interesting things, and I try to pay very close attention to what my son responds well to and what he doesn’t. I feel the materials should serve the child, not vice versa. I don’t understand why I see so many moms try a curriculum, notice it tanks with the kid, and conclude there’s something wrong with the KID! And then post, “How can I make my kid want to do this thing he hates that I think he should do anyway?” To me this is a backwards approach to education.

I’m guessing you don’t do everything, every day, but how do you decide what you don’t really need to do on a daily basis when so many things like music and foreign language need constant practice?

Some of it, as you saw above, decides itself. It is very obvious that Simply Grammar, with its 39 in-depth lessons, cannot be done every day and fits better as a weekly visitation. A lot of my notions, I got from Charlotte Mason, who really believed in child-gentle interest-whetting vs. a proscribed set of information delivered in a prescribed manner. This is also why we study hymns and Shakespeare, and only once a week. That was her recommendation and we tried it and it seems to work for Shorty. The rest, I take my cue from my son. I don’t think anyone NEEDS to do geography five times a week (or ever, really), but since my kid is endlessly fascinated by maps and state trivia, and thinks it’s great fun, we do.

Also, *I* don’t decide this. We decide it together. If he wanted to read Shakespeare every day, we would. And we only read it once a week because he asks me to read it. I think for him it’s like a little radio play. LOL, as in, ”This week on SHAKESPEARE’S DRAMATIC SOAP OPERA…”

And I realize this goes against conventional wisdom, but I don’t think a foreign language needs daily practice to master, and music practice is something my son is expected to do on his own. We are both musicians, so this isn’t really something he needs a reminder about; it’s just his great passion that he’s currently pursuing. We listen to, talk about and play music all day. I don’t think a child should be forced to play an instrument if s/he doesn’t want to. If s/he wants to play one, I would just be very frank about what’s required. “People who don’t practice the piano every day stink at piano. If you do practice every day, in a very short amount of time, you will be totally awesome at it. It’s up to you what you wanna be!” My son knows I’m honest and that I know what I’m talking about when it comes to music, so I only had to tell him this once!

I think when a child trusts you to respect his comfort zones, they trust your opinions a lot more, instead of finding them suspect and wondering if you’re trying to con him into doing something you think he should be doing, whether he hates it or not.

Do you do homework after dinner or some other trick to be done for the afternoon more quickly?

Nooooo. We do no homework. We are anti-homework! LOL! Once the boxes are done, either just before or just after lunch, his time is totally unscheduled, except that it is convenient for both of us if he showers while I’m making dinner. Otherwise, he does whatever he wants with his time. Basically, the workboxes are just a way for me to help him structure his time. He finds this helpful and encouraging. I am by nature a very UNSTRUCTURED person with a good internal clock, but he’s the opposite, he likes to plot out every minute of his time and has asked me to help him do this, so while it’s more controlling of his time than I would prefer, I need to acknowledge that his preferences are  not my preferences and I use the workboxes to help him in this way.

My son has a large workspace he likes very much because it is a very business-y roll top desk that he says “makes him feel like an executive.” LOL.  I sit next to him and let him do his thing while I work on mylaptop, unless he needs me for something, but if I see he’s taking forever on one box, I will use humor to check in with him (“EARTH TO ELI, DO YOU COPY?!” :D ) Sometimes this is enough to get him back on task. Sometimes he’ll then say he’s struggling and needs help. Sometimes he’ll say “Mom, I reeeeeeeally don’t feel like doing this today” and that is okay because I also am not always in the mood to do something every day. The homeschool police will not arrest us if we chuck a worksheet… or a whole workbook!

Obviously I’m a very laidback parent/ person/ homeschooler. When I say my son’s time is unscheduled except for the boxes, I mean it is totally unscheduled. I put no limits on any activity. He is allowed to watch TV, play video games, listen to music, chat with his friends/grandma on Facebook, or WHATEVER as much as he wants. I am right there actively engaging him in what he does, of course, but I am very much about not controlling every waking minute of a kid’s life. I think this is why workboxing and homeschooling is so low-stress for me and my kid. We just do whatever makes us happy, and don’t do whatever doesn’t. So far, so good!

Say hello to my leetle friend.

author Posted by: Andrea on date Dec 2nd, 2009 | filed Filed under: Photos, Unschooling
It was raining yesterday, and rain in our area means teeny tiny snails by the back door rain gutter (which explains the water-blackening on the stair paint).  A perfect time to go outside and observe all the creepy, crawly things that come out to play after the rain! This guy was so cute we spent a considerable amount of time observing him… and then Shorty discovered that he had a companion! Note the snail buddy by the water-blackened part. Cute! Slimy, but teeny-tiny and cute. As Shorty observed, he didn’t seem to react at all to the camera’s flash – didn’t even turn away from it. Shorty surmised that might mean snails don’t see very well, and online research confirms this.

We live in the inner city, though we have a small yard. Proof that you can do nature studies even if you don’t live in the country. :)  

Posted via email from hi, i’m andie.

I love TV and I don’t think kids should be limited in watching it

author Posted by: Andrea on date Nov 25th, 2009 | filed Filed under: Family Life, Unschooling
The subject line is the short answer to the following question that was posted on one of my homeschooling mailing lists:

I try to reduce the screen time my children watch TV (actually DVDs), but my [husband]  is the one who [usually] puts movies on.  Is there a website… that talks about the dangers of wachting the screen? I’m also trying to get my husband to read to my children. How can I get him to read more to his children?

Here is my long answer:

You can find statistics that say anything you want them to, but I personally love TV and don’t think it’s harmful even in occasional large quantities. As part of my work as a freelance writer, I freelance writing TV reviews and analyses on various web sites and columns. This grew out of writing Star Trek fan fiction adventure stories as a teenager – it helped me hone my writing skills and develop an interest in writing about TV and put me in touch with other writers online. I’ve made a living very nicely this way, and I’ve made a lot of great, intelligent friends on TV forums discussing TV, some of whom I’ve later met in real life. Some of them are even famous. :)

I’m not talking the History Channel or the Discovery Channel – though those are great, too – I’m talking House, Bones, American Idol, Heroes, Battlestar Galactica. Aside from being my preferred background noise while working, and a good way to unwind after a long day, I think I’ve learned a whole lot from TV shows. You pick up all kinds of tidbits about science, civics, law & government, history, music, health, finances, literature, art, and many other subjects. The stuff that’s distasteful to me hasn’t really influenced me to live a distasteful life, it just makes me glad I’m not like that and makes me more aware of what the consequences of harmful choices look like. And, yes, PBS, the History Channel and the Discovery Channel have GREAT content on a daily basis. I’ve even learned a ton about one of my pet subjects – interior decorating and home organization - from TV shows on the Style Channel like “Clean House” and “Dress My Nest.”

I’m not saying that you should let your kids watch Law & Order marathons all day; children don’t have the perspective or experience to know that they’re liable to see something that’s harmful or traumatizing to them on shows with intense violence or sexuality, or even adult situations like on “House,” which has little of the first 2 things but often shows open heart surgery and things like that. (I find this fascinating, but I won’t lie and say some of it is hard to watch.) Your kids don’t want to be traumatized, so it’s up to you to help them remain untraumatized and inform them of what’s on the show so they can make an informed decision. I’ve never controlled or restricted what my son watches, so he trusts that when I say, “This show has a lot of violence and an upsetting theme,” I’m not trying to tell hiim what to do or what to watch, but I’m legitimately looking out for him, and skips it. In this way, also, he has learned what is too intense for him, too.

He also knows that he can watch TV whenever he wants in his free time, so he… doesn’t actually watch that much TV. I think like with anything else, if a child knows he has access to something, it loses some of its mystique. In homes where I’ve seen “screentime” tightly regulated, TV is like a precious gem to those kids. It’s all they think about all day long! They do their schoolwork with their eye on the clock. They will harangue their mother with “is it time yet?” and argue about every last minute they have and it’s just sad. My kid just knows it’s there for fun and sometimes chooses to watch it, but mostly not. It doesn’t cast a shadow over all his free time. It’s just one of many things we can do for fun.

That’s a sticking point, of course – if there’s nothing to do in your house, then you can’t blame the kids for wanting to watch TV, vs. sitting down with a worthy novel or something.  If you’re worried your kids watch too much TV, try providing them with tons of alternatives that THEY love (not that you find worthwhile – stuff THEY enjoy and THEY think is cool.)  If you’re having too much fun to remember to watch TV, you’re not going to turn into a couch potato.

I’m saying that if your kids and husband really love watching television, maybe instead of trying to control that love, you could try to watch with them and see what it is they love so much about it and try to share it with them. I watch a lot of Disney channel shows with my son and we’ve shared a lot of laughs and had a lot of good talks with him about many issues thanks to what we see.

What we watch doesn’t always reflect my values, but when it doesn’t, I talk about it with him or mention it briefly with him, and sometimes he asks me to expound, so that’s lead to a lot of good discussions about how our values differ from the world’s. And watching “American Idol” tryouts together is a joy for four generations of my family every year. :)

Part of it is trusting what your kids’ idea of fun is, and part of it is also trusting that they’re smart enough to understand that just because Hannah Montana said it, doesn’t mean it’s okay for them to say it, too. It’s never been a problem for us.

Your husband, I’m afraid, can’t be “made” to do anything he doesn’t want to do. Unlike children, who CAN be controlled (for now), husbands are adults who get to make their own choices. Trying to take that away is likely to breed resentment, even with good intentions. How would you feel if your husband tried to make you read less, and watch more TV? It would probably just breed resentment then, too. For the peace of the household and peaceful relationships with family members, I think it’s better to just embrace what family members enjoy doing rather than try to make them conform to what my idea of “good” and “worthwhile” is. I’m trying this with my son’s video games, too, and whaddaya know, those are also turning out to be fun and educational.

To answer the original question, I am sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but there is no direct, concrete proof that watching TV is harmful in any way. There are anecdotal opinions, and there is a lot of fear-mongering and a lot of slanted conclusions based on loaded studies, but there’s no established causal correlation between TV and any kind of physical or emotional harm to kids.

I hope this post is taken in the loving, encouraging spirit it’s intended.

Posted via email from hi, i’m andie.

“Off the CHARTS!”

author Posted by: Andrea on date Nov 14th, 2009 | filed Filed under: Family Life, Unschooling
This past year or so, I’ve had something of a renaissance of my parenting perspective. I have focused a lot on being as sweet as possible to my son, as good a listener as possible, as respectful of his feelings and desires as possible. I have been working hard to always say yes or a form of yes instead of always being a naysayer and control freak authoritarian. For each “rule” I previously had, I have now reevaluated why we have that rule.  Almost always, I have found that my rules are a) arbitrary b) largely for my convenience and c) are rigid in unnecessary ways. Almost always, I have found that I can get rid of the rule and meet my son’s needs instead in some way.
Sleep is a good example. Since he turned 10, he has had to be in bed by 11 – why? Because I work nights. But his body clock is that of a night owl (mine too!) and it made him toss and turn until 1 or 2 every single night. This resulted in huge meltdowns when I would find him still up at 1AM and ”catch” him doing something “wrong” (i.e., being awake) and start lecturing, punishing and nagging. So I thought to myself – what do I need to work? Peace and quiet and the ability to concentrate without interruptions. So now we have an if-then agreement that gives us both what he wants, instead of a rigid rule that comes only from me: he can be up as late as he wants as long as he’s quiet and lets me concentrate. The instant he starts making noise, the agreement is off and it’s lights out.
The first few nights, he was up until 3 or 4 in the morning and grouchy from lack of sleep the next day. It was SO HARD, but I bit my tongue. He tried very hard to be quiet, so I didn’t go in and nag him to go to sleep. I knew he was gorging on a previously forbidden activity, the way one might binge on a bag of candy you’re not normally allowed to eat.  I knew eventually his body would regulate itself according to its needs, which, yes, apparently, is a lot less sleep than most kids.  These days he stays up an hour or two after 11 and reads or plays his Nintendo DS or listens to his iPod, but he usually turns off the light and falls asleep somewhere between 12 and 1 all on his own. Just like before – his body clock hasn’t changed – but with no meltdowns and no stress or guilt. Just peace and good, relaxing memories of bedtime. He valiantly tries to be very quiet in his nighttime activities; he knows Mom needs to work for real. And he is aware that no sleep = grouchy tired feelings, so when we have to be up early the next day, he turns the lights off earlier. Lesson I learned: you can’t actually force anyone to sleep. Lesson he learned: figuring out how much sleep his body needs to get by and feel good.
This is all well and good,, but there are still things that make him – and me – angry. I have been reading the WONDERFUL book, How to Talk so Kids Will Listen and Listen So Kids Will Talk.  The book describes how parents can make space for free expression of children’s feelings in such a way that will validate them and put them into a context everyone can handle, including the child. There is a scene described in the book where a mother tries drawing feelings with her tantrum-prone 3-year-old. “Hold everything!” she says, just as he’s about to have a meltdown and grabs some paper and crayons. She draws angry zig-zags on her paper and asks, “Are you that mad?” And the kid goes “no!!” and draws angry circles all over 4 or 5 pages. “You’re THAT mad!” she says. “NO!” he says, and tears the pages up. “You’re really mad!” the mom says. The kid then kind of gets over it and says “Now I’ll draw how happy I am.” Hee. I liked this story that I kept it in mind for the next time my son seemed to be heading into tantrum territory. It was worth a shot. He’s 11, not 3, but who knows?
My son likes to lean on things. Specifically, he leans/hangs on the shower curtain as he brushes his teeth. This has resulted in breaking the shower curtain rod 3 times in the last 2 years. Prior to that, he broke the sink entirely and the landlord had to replace it with a cabinet instead of a free-hanging sink. He’s also broken a few doors just from leaning/hanging. We have talked and talked about it, but he did it again. Of course, I was startled that he might have hurt himself, and we ended up yelling at each other a little bit.  “I FEEL SO ANGRY I COULD BREAK THINGS,” he announced. He wasn’t kidding; he sometimes does break things in extreme anger.
In the past, I might have yelled some more and guilt tripped him about what a mean, inconsiderate thing that was to say, but from all the rethinking I’ve been doing, I saw this as a communication attempt from him. He was telling me his feelings. This was good! Better than breaking things is being told he’s mad.  I said, “You’re REALLY angry.”  “Yeah!!!” he agreed.  “HOLD IT,” I cried, and ran to the printer and got some blank paper and some crayons. Angry zigzags. “Are you that mad?”  He shook his head and drew broad stripes across the page, right off onto the table. A year ago I would have complained that I was going to have to clean that up and criticized his “imperfect” efforts at expressing himself. On this day, I thought, “Eh, I wipe the table down every day anyway” and didn’t even acknowledge it.  “I’m so mad the paper isn’t enough to…”  he faltered.
“To hold it all!” I exclaimed.
“Yeah!” He drew a few more furious lines that all extended off the page.  “I MIGHT NEED MORE PAPER.” I hurriedly got him more paper, and got some for myself.
“I’m mad like this,” I said, and drew some angry spirals on my page. He watched with interest.
“I’m mad like THIS,” he said, except he was not mad anymore. Glint of laughter starting to burgeon in his eye. He drew huge zig zags in a different color. Suddenly the crayon broke and he looked at me anxiously, awaiting a reprimand.
“You’re so mad you broke the crayon!!!” I said in amazement. “That’s, like, SUPER SUPER MAD.”
“YEAH!” he drew a few more lines, grinning now. “I’m so mad it’s off the PAGE.”
“Off the CHARTS!” I offered.
“OFF THE CHARTS!!” he cried, crumpling his paper and gleefully throwing it up in the air, like confetti,  all while giggling. I was laughing too by then.  No tantrum in sight. Just a happy face of a little boy who had been allowed to express how he felt and was grateful to be taken seriously.  Then I was able to smooch his cheek and tell him that I was very worried he could hurt himself if he kept hanging on the shower curtain when he was in the bathroom, and what could I do to help him be more safe in the bathroom?
“I feel bad that I broke the curtain,” he admitted, now totally calm. In the past, he might have spent hours ranting he hadn’t done anything wrong. “I wasn’t hanging. Just pulling while I was leaning. I guess I’ll try to remember I can’t pull on it because it breaks and falls on my head if I do that. I’ll lean on the counter instead if I feel like I need to lean.”  He figured it out all by himself, without me telling him what to do, without nagging or berating or lecturing.  He ambled off, muttering “off the CHARTS!” and still giggling.
Since that happened, “off the charts” has become our new family inside joke meaning “that made me blindly furious!” It’s a gauge. “That didn’t make me feel quite off the charts. But it did make me want to scribble a little.”  Or “I would have crumpled my paper, that made me so mad!” It’s silly and it makes sense only to us, but it’s a way to give voice to feelings. It has been a “lightbulb” moment for him. He knows there are ways to talk about your feelings now, and that he has someone who is willing to listen, even to the “bad” ones, judgment-free. He hasn’t had a tantrum in months.
That, to me, is worth a thousand intact shower curtain rods.

You’ll always know your neighbor, you’ll always know your pal…

author Posted by: Andrea on date Nov 6th, 2009 | filed Filed under: Art and Music, History & Geography, Internet Resources, Unschooling
Today we had a long productive day in which we did very little that looked like schoolwork. :)  

We were up late talking and reading the night before, so today we both slept in. Over breakfast, we watched a music documentary, then we watched and discussed an episode of Mythbusters (topic: combustion and kitchen safety), then it was time for our weekly park playdate. After that, which took 3 hours and during which Shorty got happily muddied, we went to the grocery store and challenged each other to pick out the weirdest fruit in the produce department. That was the most fun we’ve had doing the groceries in a long time. We decided we were going to buy our finds and take them home and chop them open and see how they’re prepared (“But not necessarily eat them,” Shorty clarified, hedging his bets against a fruit that might look cool but taste disgusting. Agreed.)

Initially we were going to buy a pomelo. This thing basically looked like a ginormous grapefruit. I’ve never seen anything like it – it was bigger than my head! The Wikipedia link says that they tend to be between 2 and 4 lbs., but this one was closer to 7!  They sound like they’d be tasty, but I wasn’t about to spend $9 on one piece of fruit, so we decided to just look it up online and buy our second choices. There were quite a few to pick from, because our local Publix has a pretty awesome produce section, but ultimately, he picked a persimmon and I picked a pomegranate. They’re waiting on our table to be discovred tomorrow morning. And maybe, maybe be eaten. :)

Then we read a little before bed/ quiet time. Shorty doesn’t really have a bedtime – I have figured out it’s pretty useless to try to “make” someone go to sleep – but since I have to work nights, I do insist that he stay quiet somewhere other than my workspace, and he usually goes to sleep between 12AM-1AM, but we do like to read together each night.  Right now, we’re working our way through the historical fiction novel Viking Adventures since he is currently way into Vikings, and after that, Shorty felt like reading a few more pages in ”Much Ado About Nothing” from Tales from Shakespeare (“It’s full of LOTS OF DRAMA!” which apparently is appealing to a preteenager, lol).

Then we read in our 50-state atlas. We’re trying to read about one state per week, since he is intensely interested in geography. Typically this tends to be an excursion in rabbit trails when we discover all kinds of interesting things about each state, and today was no different – we had New York state for the day and obviously NY is one of the most interesting states in the nation. Shorty surprised me by recalling some historical fact about Henry Hudson he’d read – over 2 years ago.  Aside from learning the surprising fact that NY is mostly rural and that the Empire State Building is named after the state’s nickname, we read a little about the Erie Canal, and I mentioned that there was a song that had been written about it. 

Eyes lit up. Time to break out the YouTube. 

First we found this brief documentary and discussion about the original folk song and its provenance, which didn’t have the whole song (a fact about which I expressed disappointment) but Shorty insisted the documentary was ”very historical and interesting.”

Then we listened to this surprisingly traditional and fun version by folk singer Suzanne Vega, with whom Shorty is somewhat familiar, as I’m a fan of her music.

Then we listened to the much grittier country-folk version by Bruce Springsteen, which didn’t have as clean a melody line, but had a LOT more emotion.

And a couple of other versions we didn’t like as much. :)

What we didn’t have much success in finding, however, was the state song, “I Love New York.”  YouTube was difficult to search on, because there’s a trashy reality show by the same name, and that comprised the entirety of the search results no matter what we tried. So if anyone has a link to (legally!) listen to the New York state song, please do send it my way!

Posted via email from hi, i’m andie.

Why we don’t do special diets.

author Posted by: Andrea on date Nov 5th, 2009 | filed Filed under: Andrea's Reviews, Family Life, Unschooling
Lately I’ve been reading a lot about unschooling/ natural parenting. What I’ve found is that the more I read, the more I have to unsubscribe from homeschooling list/ discussion/ message forum I’ve been reading, because I find it so toxic to deal with so many people’s overwhelming control issues.

One of the main ways in which people perpetuate control issues is through their controlling their kids’ food. Whether it be through a special diet or through vegetarianism or limiting sweets or SOMETHING. I guess since it’s such a basic need, it’s a basic starting point for control. For me this has been very evident in online and RL circles of parents with special needs kids. It seems like everyone who homeschools a kid with autism is obsessed with controlling the autism (or more accurately, the autistic child) via controlling their kids’ food. 

When my son was very small, I tried the Gluten Free, Casein Free diet prescribed to many parents of autistic kids. I saw my son suffering, and connected it to his being different from other kids; I didn’t blame it on the fact that *I* was the one struggling because his personality and needs don’t fall in line with cliche child development expectations but because he was autistic and hyper and I was convinced THAT NEEDED FIXING and this diet claimed to help me do that.

I tried the GFCF for 9 months. It was sincerely all 31 flavors of hell.

It’s expensive. I am a single parent who works from home and though Dad is supportive and contributes, we are on a very tight budget and I have limited amounts of time, so the cheaper alternative – make every single item of food from scratch – was just out unrealistic. GFCF cooking and eating was expensive and time consuming.

The food is gross. All the GFCF substitutes for the real things are gross, y’all. Fake bread and pasta and cookies – all gross. Real Oreos are good, GFCF “oreos” are nasty (my son and I have a joke now – any food whose name includes quotes is probably inedible). Some things are edible, but edible isn’t the same as enjoyable. And I’m not going to pay $7 for a marginally edible loaf of bread that takes me 3 hours to make, when $1.59 buys me a really good normal loaf from Publix.

It’s incredibly stressful to maintain. I hated the diet the whole time we adhered to it. I felt like a horrible person, snatching cookies out of my kid’s hands at birthday parties, naysaying all his food preferences, nagging him to drink soymilk (which neither of us, we can now admit, really likes) instead of cow’s milk, etc etc. etc. It was socially limiting and restrictive to my child, and very depressing.

It’s never-ending. The more you find out about this way of eating, the longer the list of foods you cannot eat gets. Your food world gets narrower and narrower.

It is pseudoscience. When I really started questioning and reading the scant research there is out there, I discovered there is almost NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF that it helps make autistic kids happier.

And yet there are autism treatment centers who won’t even see you for a consultation if you are unwilling to absolutely control everything your kid eats.

I am not saying there is no such thing as a gluten intolerance or allergy to artificial ingredients or whatever. Obviously there are. There are tests for that. I now tell parents, if you think your kid is celiac, or allergic to anything else, this is a serious thing that is permanently and radically life-altering. Get him tested and make sure there are solid medical reasons for controlling his food to that degree. Don’t start eliminating all your kids’ preferred food just because you hope, based on frantic Internet anecdotes, that it’ll make your 5yo less hyper. (God forbid a 5yo should be hyper.) That is a recipe for sure-fire misery all around and probably won’t do anything but perpetuate misery.

I now think it’s easier to blame a slice of bread for your unhappy but otherwise perfectly normal-for-him 5yo than it is to blame your own parenting. I’m not saying that to be unkind to other parents; I’m saying that out of my own experiences. It was easier for me to blame wheat and milk for the unhappiness in our home than it was for me to blame my attempts at control and my lack of understanding toward my son.

I read so much about autism and diets now and parents’ massive control issues and pain seem so transparent, it hurts me to read it. “You’ve heard apples cause problems? My son loves apples. He eats apples every day. Maybe it’s making him more autistic. What about apples is bad? Maybe I should throw out all his apples.” And I just hurt for that poor little child who already takes so little joy in eating, and now he won’t get his apples either!

In fact, a big part of the GFCF autism cult is the idea that if a child strongly prefers a food, it is because they’re “addicted” to it and causes serotonin levels to spike “like an opiate” (again, adherents will freely concede there is no scientific basis for this at all, it is almost entirely anecdotal) and that preferred food should automatically be SUSPECT and possibly eliminated in a radical way.  It seems so obvious now to me where this all stems from. I feel like thousands of autistic kids must be living lives of quiet food-related desperation because of this, because they are told that what they love to eat makes them SICK. And sadly, SICK mostly means “more authentically themselves”.

About 9 months into the GFCF diet, I gave up and announced we we would start eating whatever we wanted. My kid is now 11 and eats whatever he wants, whenever he wants it.  I am a single mom on a limited budget and can’t afford EVERYTHING, so each week we make a list of stuff we feel like eating, way more than we could eat that week. We include stuff I like and stuff he likes – they don’t always overlap, but neither of us censor ourselves. Then we check on the local grocery ads and, being fiscally responsible sorts, we try to buy food for the week based on what’s on sale from our list.

We then have a list of stuff we can make from what we bought posted on our fridge. It’s a list of about 25 different meal ideas. They are suggestions. Every mealtime, he checks out the list and picks out what he wants and I make it. Sometimes we have breakfast for dinner or vice versa. Sometimes I make new things as “sides;” sometimes he tries them and sometimes he doesn’t. He’s incredibly healthy; he hasn’t been sick in forever and he’s shooting up like a weed, so I don’t worry.

Annnnd. Guess what. He’s still “hyper” and high-energy (when did we decide this was an illness?). He’s also still autistic. But taking ice cream and chocolate milk away isn’t going to change that for him. So if he wants ice cream, he eats ice cream. And so do I! It is interesting to me that despite his school-psychologist diagnosis of “worst case scenario ADHD” my son has a great capacity for attention – to things in which he is interested. I just no longer classify his interests as dysfunctional and no longer try to coercively change them with food.

Of course I cannot say this on any autism-homeschool list without being flayed alive. When I expressed doubts about the GFCF racket (it is a racket, there are whole companies devoted to marketing vitamins, nasty bread substitutes, etc. to adherents of the diet) on these lists, I was told I was a bad parent who didn’t try hard enough and who sought after my own convenience over the “needs” of my child. I have even been called abusive because people believe giving wheat to a kid with autism is the same as giving sugar by the spoonfuls to a child with diabetes. But the reality is that my child didn’t “need” to have cookies snatched out of his hand at birthday parties to be happy.

My child just needs to be loved and encouraged exactly as he is.

Posted via email from hi, i’m andie.

Workbox Wednesday Fun: Klutz Lego Crazy Contraptions

author Posted by: Andrea on date Oct 22nd, 2009 | filed Filed under: Unschooling

Shorty has fine motor delays, and one of the fun ways I’ve found that help him work on them is books and activities from Klutz. I’ve been a big fan of their inexpensive, kid-friendly kits for years. They seem to have stuff tailored for every interest, ability level and age. No, I’m not getting paid to say this ;)

I put fine motor skill builders in my son’s workboxes a couple of times a week, and a lot of them are Klutz books.  The latest one we got was Lego Crazy Contraptions. I had a coupon for 25% off my order and free shipping thanks to RetailMeNot, so I was able to get it cheaper direct from the web site than from Amazon. I was pretty proud of myself for that one.  This kit in particular has been a HUGE hit with my Lego-loving kiddo who doesn’t always know what to build but feels really accomplished when he’s able to make LEGO things according to directions. The kit has sixteen different projects to make “crazy” contraptions with, such as the world’s most annoying top, a wall climber and this contraption that he made as a workbox assignment, the “robotic grabby thing” (his name for it).

Here is a picture of him threatening to grab my nose with it. LOL.  Next on our agenda is their Potholder making kit.  The nice people at Klutz had the foresight to anticipate the usual “But that’s for GIRLS!!!!!” drama from Shorty and put a little boy on the back cover ;) Somehow I don’t think he’ll be QUITE as enthusiastic about that one, but hey, these are valuable life skills here!

Posted via email from hi, i’m andie.

Thought this might be helpful to some…

I recently was confronted with a question by a first-time homeschooling mom, who just pulled her son out of public school and intends to begin homeschooling him in the fall. The question is one that, as an experienced homeschooler, I think is almost too broad to answer, but at the same time, is intuitive for first-time homeschoolers who don’t necessarily know where to start: “What’s the best curriculum to buy for my child?”

Since there are folks reading this journal who are either curious about homeschooling or leaning towards doing so themselves, I am going to repost my response. It is linktastic. Hopefully someone can find it helpful.

***

If you’re like me and you tend to second-guess yourself, I really recommend HomeschoolReviews as a good reference. It is an online forum where hundreds of homeschoolers have posted their reviews of pretty much any curriculum out there. I thought it was tremendously helpful in choosing what we picked for my son.

Last year, we went with WinterPromise – http://www.winterpromise.com – for science, art and history, and Rod and Staff – http://www.rodandstaffbooks.com – for language arts and math – and we couldn’t be happier, but this will be our sixth year homeschooling, and it will be the first time that we’ve used the same curriculum two years in a row, so that should tell you something.

There is no one-size-fits-all response. The truth is, the best homeschool curriculum is the one that your child enjoys, is best suited to his learning style (I recommend the book Discovering Your Child’s Learning Style – it has been invaluable in this regard) and also what is best suited to your TEACHING style. If you hate doing it day after day, your child won’t love learning it either. :) To some degree, it is a bit of trial and error, but sites like HomeschoolReviews help you to at least rule out what you would definitely hate.

Unlike traditional classrooms, there are a bunch of different ways to homeschool. This list is in no way meant to be exhaustive, but here are just a few of the more widely used approaches and some useful links off the top of my head.

Links and Resources This Way!

The world is actually not a classroom, no.

author Posted by: Andrea on date Jun 24th, 2008 | filed Filed under: Andrea's Reviews, Charlotte Mason, Family Life, General Homeschooling, Language Arts, Math, Science, Unschooling

First, two things that made me laugh today: What the Buck’s review of the Disney Channel’s Camp Rock (he has many more highly accurate and equally funny take-downs of films and TV shows here) and this temporary to-do list tattoo, for those of us who have ever written things to remember on our palms. Which is all of us, am I right?

I have been giving a lot of thought this year to letting go of the concept of school in me and Shorty’s homeschool and aiming, instead, for just an “educational environment.” How very unschooling of me, I know, even though I am not an unschooler and in fact have strong critiques of many common unschooler claims ((a post for another day, I’m afraid). But I digress.

For the first couple of years of homeschooling, I would say the first 3, I did “school at home” because it was all I knew, and having had formal training in early childhood pedagogy, it was all I could conceive as a model for small children learning. Teacher at the front, children sitting primly at a desk with open textbooks whose material matched whatever was being written on the board. It was familiar. From my many lengthy discussions with my dear friends at my local park group, this is a common starting point, ESPECIALLY if you have a formal background in education. It’s all you know.

Around Shorty’s first grade, I discovered The Well-Trained Mind. I devoured it and, being a compulsive list-maker, I promptly and proudly mapped out the next, oh, eight or nine years of my kid’s education. This was partly because a classical education such as is outlined in the WTM is the ULTIMATE school-at-home experience, with the loftiest ideaIs and the most robust scope. It is a very popular text and academic outline for homeschoolers, probably for the same reason that school-at-home is the first thing we all try. I think for a new homeschooling parent looking for validation and structure and the promise of an excellent education for their children, the WTM is very impressive.

Unfortunately, I had not yet grasped the full scope of Shorty’s learning difficulties, or the fact that most little boys and many little girls at age 6 (or 7… or 8… or…) do not have the capacity or attention span to sit still and quietly learn Latin and recite poetry for 5 hours a day. Shorty found The Story of the World, the WTM’s history text for that grade level, mystifying and bizarre and totally inaccessible, and thanks to his auditory processing issues, asking him to narrate anything was an exercise in total frustration. He can EASILY do all those things now at age 10, but it was just too mature for him four years ago, frankly. Honestly, I don’t know ANY six-year-old with the attention span to sit through a four-page, pictureless chapter about ancient Mesopotamia so I don’t even know how realistic the WTM’s educational goals are, but the point is, Shorty was a square peg being shoved into the WTM’s triangle hole. So while I still like some of their ideals and reading lists and still use some of their recommended materials, I, shall we say, aimed to loosen up.

Yet third grade was our most disastrous, I think. I wanted Shorty to do something more fun and more structured than our previous three years, which had been kind of a mish-mash free-for-all of workbooks and library books and half-abandoned curriculum. To me, Alpha Omega’s Switched-On Schoolhouse looked perfect. It was relatively cheap (we got all five subjects off eBay for something like $150), it kept records and “grades” for me, and it was computer-based, which meant it HAD to be fun (right? right??? umm…) so it seemed ideal and for a few months, it was. But it was also extremely dry and repetitive and sucked all the fun out of learning. One subject, “history,” which was not history at all, but more like a lame, surreal overview of American agricultural social studies, was abandoned within weeks and replaced by Story of the World Vol 2, which by then Shorty was mature enough to both understand and read on his own.

And it was still SCHOOL AT HOME, except the computer was the teacher and the screen was the chalkboard. It also indulged Shorty’s “producer personality,” which he definitely got from his mom. He likes to COMPLETE CHECKLISTS. It doesn’t matter how much he actually retains from the tasks, so long as they are done and can be CHECKED OFF. I call this our “Ta-da! tendency,” as in, “Ta-da, I am done, end of story!” Ergo, I am pretty sure he didn’t learn a single thing the whole year. Learning to tailor an educational environment to a specific individual’s strengths and weaknesses will involve a great many instances of trial and error, so I try to forgive myself by telling myself that we still had another 10 years to make up for it, and he definitely has made great strides this year.

This year I discovered Charlotte Mason’s child-friendly , gentle, Montessori-like, yet comprehensive ideas and fell in love. To me, it seems to be the best of both worlds of a broad, classical education and interest-led learning and I read everything I could on the subject. Shortly thereafter, I discovered WinterPromise, an AWESOME Charlotte Mason style curriculum, which is what we used for science, nature studies, narration, literature, history, poetry, art and lots and lots of hands-on stuff this year.

BOY HOWDY, has it been a hit. Shorty’s attitude toward learning has done a radical about-face. Shorty no longer considers any of the WinterPromise stuff “school” – he will say things like “When we get done with school [meaning math and penmanship] can we do more WinterPromise stuff?” and it amazes me how much he has retained. We look forward to doing more of the same for next year and if it goes as well as it went this year, we’ll stick with this curriculum through at least junior high.

We are also happy with our language arts choice (the WTM’s rec, actually) and it would take us a bit longer to finally find a math level and program that Shorty could work with which ended up being the math curriculum from the same publisher, only he is a year behind, thanks to not having learned anything with Switched-On Schoolhouse. (Ugh). Rod and Staff is a Mennonite (read: Amish) publishing company, and their texts are very quaint, and definitely Christian, but so generic as to only be offensive if you are completely secular (i.e., if you cannot deal with “Math is the language of the universe… because God made the universe and God is a god of order and loveliness.”) The Amish angle is annoying to more cosmopolitan homeschoolers, but Shorty and I find it entertaining when the word problems are like, “Prudence and her 11 brothers and sisters each milked 6 cows…” Hee! They are actually very Charlotte Mason-ish too. More review for kids who need it, less review for kids who don’t, gentle approach, etc. His rote math skills have lept forward by leaps and bounds. He is already a strong speller and studies grammar and vocabulary on his own (word geekery… it is genetic, aye) so their light language arts curriculum with an emphasis on composition skills is perfect for him. Again with the “tailoring the educational experience to the individual” thing.

We plan to keep going with this same combo next year, adding in some formal health studies, typing, and French. Maybe more art and music appreciation.

And yet, our homeschool doesn’t look very much like a classroom anymore. We don’t do anything that Shorty doesn’t enjoy. We have academics whenever we have a few hours to spare in the day, whether that be in the morning, after lunch, right before judo/scouts/ whatever, right before bed. Any and all attempts to create a structured daily schedule for me, a work-at-home single parent, and Shorty, a fly-by-the-seat-of-his-pants budding artist and visionary ;) have failed utterly. We “do school” on the floor, on the couch, walking around outside, driving around in the car, whatever. Though I think this has been the most educationally rich year for Shorty, I am no longer even comfortable calling it “doing school.” I just say “Let’s do some book stuff!” and let him pick the order. He is older now and he has a lot more say in what he does now, and since I want to encourage independent learning, a lot of it consists of giving him a to-read list, with the expectation that everything he has read will be narrated back to me either in writing or orally, to make sure he has read and understood the material.

The homeschooling community has a fond saying that “the world is our classroom!” I understand the sentiment behind it. We can use the whole world as a resource for learning. But this has sat poorer and poorer with me the longer I homeschool. I don’t want the world to be my child’s classroom. I don’t like classrooms anymore! For many kids, classrooms delineate where the learning starts AND stops. I will never forget my friend C’s anecdote about the time when, for Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday, her kids and her spent a weekend reading about MLK,Jr. and watching his “I have a dream” speech on YouTube and just generally getting all caught up in the excitement about learning about this amazing man’s life. Then the traditionally-schooled neighbor children came over to play, and when C’s kids excitedly rushed them over to the computer to watch the YouTube stuff, the neighbor kids were all “UGH, NO, that’s SCHOOL STUFF, and today is our DAY OFF.” Sad but understandable, all around.

Or to name a less tragic example, the time when my kid saw all the neighbor kids coming home on the last day of school 2 years ago, and they were all whooping and leaping for joy. “What are you so happy about?” he asked one child, who exclaimed, “We don’t have any more school until AUGUST!” Shorty solemnly turned to me and whispered, “Boy, going to school must be HORRIBLE.” Heeeeeee.

To me, that is the difference between my educational goals and institutional school. I do not want my child to just think of learning as a chore he has to endure ten months out of the year 8 hours a day. I want him to feel like he has the capacity to learn anything he wants, to indulge any curiosity that strikes his fancy. I don’t want him to feel like the world is a classroom. But I guess “The world is our encyclopedia or possibly library or like a living Google or something!” doesn’t have quite the same ring. ;)

And so it is that this year, we have finally bid adieu to what I hope is the last remaining remnant of a school background. We have agreed that since we don’t get any schoolwork done from Thanksgiving through New Year’s Day anyway, we are going to continue to do “book stuff” all through the summer (this is not drudgery if your kid thinks this is FUN, e.g., Shorty has already gleefully filled my Netflix queue with History Channel documentaries we previously thought we wouldn’t have time to watch) and our “summer vacation” will be late November through January, so our “school year” will be January through October. We’ll see how this works out with us intending to move across the country next summer.

I guess we’ll do what we always do – learn to cross that bridge when we get to it. :)

Formal Language Arts: To Be Or Not To Be

author Posted by: Andrea on date Aug 21st, 2007 | filed Filed under: Andrea's Reviews, Charlotte Mason, Freebies, History & Geography, Kid Lit, Math, Unschooling

Yes, I do realize the irony of titling a post about whether or not a formal language arts curriculum is necessary with a quote from Hamlet, thankyouverymuch. 

Today we tried the first lesson from Rod & Staff’s Building With Diligence grammar and writing textbook for the fourth grade.  I’m not sure why we did so, to be honest. I just thought I’d give it a try.  With all the reading and the cursive handwriting program we’re doing this year already,  and factoring in the fact that DS9 is an excellent speller and intuitively good at grammar and syntax, I was going to forgo a formal language arts program this year. I figured, why fix what’s not broken?

However, after giving it some more thought, I think I’ve decided I’m going to work gently through the R&S book at his pace, just because I would like to do more formal writing and language arts courses next year from Florida Virtual School and don’t want the concept of formal composition to be totally alien to him.  R&S also has fun stuff like sentence diagramming, which my little visual-kinesthetic-spatial learner will get a big kick out of.  I’m going to go at his pace and we’re going to do the exercises as time permits. It is a lot of writing and some of the assignments, I feel, are excessive, so we’re just going to wing it – do some of them orally, do only half the questions, etc. But as it stands right now, we DON’T do any copywork, so I think it will be useful to have some part of our homeschool in which DS9 has to formally plot out sentences and, eventually, paragraphs and essays.

I’m also going to have him working through a basic spelling work book, Spelling Skills: Grade 4. I’m thinking we’ll do possibly 2 to 4 pages once per week. I’m thinking Friday, since that’s our low-key day. I never thought DS9 was really “the workbook type,” but recently he has expressed to me that he enjoys workbooks, particularly colorful ones, and these are colorful. I have the math workbook from the same publisher, but that, unlike the spelling workbook, is way too flimsy to be used as a primary text. It’s good for drill and review only.

I’ve also fallen belatedly in love with StarFall.  It is a completely free online phonics and reading curriculum for toddlers on up to 3rd or 4th grade, and it’s absolutely beautiful.  I wish I’d listened to people and used this web site 2 or 3 years ago when people first started recommending it to me.  The curriculum looks excellent and complete.  Unfortunately, even its highest level is a bit below my kiddo’s level at this point, but it still has some useful things, like introduction to drama, and has some great starting points for composer studies and artist studies that I may be using soon.  It also has some fun, stress-free grammar games for my guy, so I may still be able to squeeze some use out of this web site yet. But for those of you with littler people – I really encourage you to check it out. It is a FANTASTIC free resource.

I have been very torn on the issue of language arts, to be quite honest. I know there are people whose kids have gone on to graduate from Ivy League colleges who don’t believe in teaching ANY formal language arts – just basic phonics, basic punctuation rules, lots of copywork (which doesn’t work for my dysgraphic kiddo), individualized spelling lists based on “problem words,” and dictation.  Vocabulary and grammatical sensibilities develop simply by having the child read a lot of quality literature.  The child, it is said, absorbs grammar, spelling and syntax rules the way s/he originally learned language in the first place - by “osmosis,” i.e., seeing and hearing functional, quality use of the language and then intuiting its technical rules.  

It sounds like common sense, and I wish I could trust this process. I know that the reason that DS9 is such a good speller and so good at grammar is because he reads so much. I do think that if I were self-disciplined enough to do the dictation and copywork consistently, I wouldn’t need the R&S book or the spelling workbook. But I’m not, so I do.  Also, again, I do believe that knowing how to construct a formal sentence, paragraph, and eventually, an essay are useful things if the child wants to continue formal academics at the collegiate level, so instead of forgoing a language arts curriculum altogether, I’m just going to attempt to introduce these concepts in a gentle, child-paced, child-friendly way.

In that vein, I need to post my yearly “Assigned Independent Multi-Cultural Reading List” for the year like I do every year, but I’ll leave that for a separate post. ;) Suffice it to say, DS9 is reading through an excellent abridged version of The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe, and when asked to narrate today’s chapter, he talked nonstop for 20 minutes. I guess that one’s a hit!

Click to read more about our curriculum experiences so far…